For example, Commander David Dixon Porter on his 60-year-old foster brother, David Glasgow Farragut: “Men of his age in a seafaring life are not fit for the command of important enterprises, the lack the vigor of youth.” (p. McPherson’s mastery of the vast literature on the Civil War yields memorable zingers. The most important statistic is not how many blockade-runners got through, but how many ships and how much cargo would have come in and gone out of Confederate ports if there had been no blockade.” (pp. (224) Finally, McPherson concludes that the blockade was “a crucial factor in the war’s outcome. 224) But in comparing Confederate and Union accomplishments on the waters, McPherson gives the prize to the Union, noting that Confederate “achievements paled in comparison with the Union navy’s contribution to Northern military operations. The destruction brought about by Confederate commerce raiders and privateers “did not significantly hinder the Union war effort,” even though they “did weaken the blockade by diverting its ships into fruitless hunts for the raiders and cripple the merchant marine.” (p. “By any measure of cost-effectiveness,” McPherson writes, “the nation got more than its money’s worth.” (p.224). One-twelfth of the Union’s military spending was for naval operations. On big the big issues, McPherson has measured and informed judgments. But he awards a strategic victory to Virginia for “infecting many Union naval officers with ‘ram fever’ that inhibited their aggressiveness whenever Confederate ironclads were in the vicinity-or were suspected to be.” (p.105) Or, did Admiral Farragut actually shout “Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!” at Mobile Bay? “Whether Farragut said these words or not, he certainly did order the Hartford to go ahead.” (p. Who “won” the Battle of Hampton Roads between Virginia and Monitor? McPherson awards a tactical victory to Monitor for accomplishing its mission of protecting the wooden warships. McPherson provides a clear glimpse of virtually every significant naval issue during the war and sensible assessments of big questions and specific problems. The following eleven chapters provide a roughly chronological account of the main theaters, issues, and characters of the naval war. His eight-page introduction provides a remarkable summary of the naval war. The narrative charts the ebb and flow of successes and failures, and the changing mix in which some Union victories were almost exclusively naval, while some were achieved through “combined operations.” McPherson provides concise pictures of the major naval actions on inland waterways, along the coasts, and on the high seas. Nevertheless, McPherson demonstrates that this is not the story of guaranteed naval victory. 226) Subscribers to Naval History Book Reviews will not disagree. McPherson declares on page 1 that “the Union deserves more credit for Northern Victory than it has traditionally received.” He concludes by saying: “the war could not have been won without the contributions of the navy.” (p. McPherson, well known for such works as Battle Cry of Freedom, For Cause and Comrades, and Tried by War, now offers War on the Waters, a volume that compresses a complex topic into 226 pages of text and skillfully merges the “big picture” with specific themes, colorful quotations, and powerful vignettes. McPherson, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill NC, (2012).ĭo we need yet another book about the naval side of the Civil War? When the book has been written by the nation’s preeminent scholar of the Civil War, the answer is certainly yes. If there are any mistakes, please contact me.By James M. Information on this page is provided in good faith that it is accurate, but in no way is the data guanteed to be accurate. 1984 ATC250R Specifications General Specs
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |